Headlines: Catholic University of America postpones screening of 'Milk'
Sometimes, with the Catholic Church, you don’t know whether
to laugh or cry. It’s in the hands of
such dunderheads that, much as you’d like to push a button and make them all
disappear into thin air, you know it would be a waste of effort. They are self-destructing before our very
eyes.
It’s a wretched organization. Retrograde (Galileo’s reputation was
restored, yes, but it took 400 years), insensitive (you’ve got AIDS? You want to make love to your wife? OK, but no condoms!), and stupid (read on). There are good folks within the institution
peddling as fast as they can to save it, but they are not making much headway,
seems to me. Not if this latest attempt
by the Catholic University in Washington, D.C. to assure that its students
remain ignorant of history is any indication.
As a “pontifical institution,” when it gives you an ecclesiastical
degree, it does so in the name of the pope.
Both Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI visited the campus when they
made state visits to the United States.
This is not a fringe organization.
It represents the very heart of the church itself.
A political group, the College Democrats, had planned to
host a “milk and cookies” event, and had invited a political science professor
from the campus and a member of a neighboring Montgomery County (Maryland)
Democrat Club to speak on the effect of the gay rights movement on the
Democratic Party, after which they planned to show the film, Milk, the biopic on the life of gay
activist Harvey Milk.
Event organizers got approval, they say, and advertisements
were sent out. But then somebody hit the
panic button. One of the school
officials began objecting to the size of the rainbow flag on the brochures, and
the fact that October is LGBT awareness month.
The brochure read: “Kick off LGBT Awareness Month!” Now it began to look to the school official
like advocacy, and not information, and since the school’s charter prohibits
advocacy of gay awareness – or anything at all that would suggest being gay is
OK - pace Pope Francis and his famous declaration, “Who am I to judge?” – the
event had to be canceled until they could do a jesuitical number on the event
to assure that it was purely “educational” and did not involve advocacy.
You can see it’s not the old days, when the church preached
hatred and everybody simply bowed in submission. Today the church has to reckon with a new and
healthier morality – not one that requires submission of women and
disparagement of a healthy sexual life.
The church, as usual, drags its feet.
As usual they’re trying to have their cake and eat it too.
They’re using reason, at least. But it’s the sort of reason they used when
they came up with the idea that a good approach to the child molestation
epidemic would be to pay off the victims and bury the story. All the logical synapses are firing, but
they’re missing the big picture, going for immediate solutions to what they
define as problems and not understanding the world is out ahead of them when it
comes to human rights. The Catholic
church is one of the main sources of animus against LGBT people in this
country. That’s always been the case,
just as it has always been a patriarchal force for the subjugation of
women. But now the country is onto them.
Instead of following the common sense dictum that when you
find yourself in a ditch you should stop digging, they’re grabbing the shovels yet again. I trust somebody will
whisper in the ear of the dodo in charge of this fiasco that gay people have
broken free. The shackles are gone. The Dixie flag has been taken off the state
house. Pick your metaphor. The Catholic Church no longer has the power
to teach hatred and tell lies about gay people.
We are not sinners, you sweet hypocrites, you. We are people with a God-given sexuality that
is what it is and we are done done done with your attempts to turn us into
lepers. Stick that bony finger of yours
in your ear, and get out of my face with the “naughty, naughty” crap.
What blows my mind is not that this Catholic institution is
anti-gay. It’s that it is
anti-education. So what if the folks
putting on the event – all twenty of them or so (I’m told it was a small group)
– crossed the line between “information giving” and “advocacy.” Do you think a Cinco de Mayo group meeting on
campus would fail to make plain they thought being Mexican was a great thing?
The film Milk
recognizes the status Harvey Milk has acquired in history. He is a hero to LGBT people and that fact is
not going to go away. I know you are not to be blamed directly for the views of your defenders, any more than Christ is to be blamed for the despicable institution you run in his name, but you do share considerable responsibility for the way they've taken their cue from your leadership. Just look at some of the comments of these folks convinced they are rushing to your defense. Missing the woods for the trees entirely, several of them point out, for example, that Milk has been charged
with having had sex with underage kids. They all fail to mention, please note, that the “kids” were sexually mature teenagers, and not
prepubescent altar boys.
Would you have your students remain ignorant of the
contributions of Martin Luther? He
certainly did more damage to your institution (arguably by making it more
Christian) than Harvey Milk did. And he,
like many clerics of his day, was a raging anti-Semite. Note that Martin Luther King was known to have
had extra-marital affairs. Note that
Gandhi had some seriously wacko ideas.
Note that Nelson Mandela had serious problems in his immediate family
life and admitted in his autobiography, “I led a thoroughly immoral life.”
You may doubt that Milk is up there with Mandela, Gandhi, Martin
Luther or Martin Luther King, but you cannot deny his impact on American life
and the lives of millions of LGBT people was overwhelmingly positive, even
heroic. And you really ought to know that
your effort to make sure that knowledge is kept from your students will only be
seen over time as another example of the ugly Catholic hand of censorship. It will only backfire, in the long run.
We will remember this event, many of us.
Even more of us will remember that Harvey Milk died at the
hands of Dan White*, who was described as a "good, Catholic boy" who always went to
church.
Where he learned from you bastards to hate.
If I were a praying man, I’d pray that your path to oblivion
might be unencumbered.
photo credit: shooting self in foot
For an opposing view - i.e., that the church (at least the CUA) did not shoot itself in the foot but actually knew exactly what it was doing, scroll down to Catholic blogger Jerry Slevin's remarks at: http://bilgrimage.blogspot.com/2014/10/catholic-academy-as-serious-part-of.html. Jerry claims the cancellation was a move to bring out the fundamentalist Catholic vote for Republicans in the upcoming election. An interesting notion. But even if Jerry is right, I still maintain the act of censorship will only backfire and in the larger context make the church officials look more foolish. They may gain some ground momentarily in a local election, but will lose hearts and minds of thinking Catholics, who want an increase in human rights as much as anybody else.
ReplyDeleteSunday, Oct. 5 - Check out Frank Bruni's article, "The Church's Gay Obsession" in today's NY Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/opinion/sunday/frank-bruni-the-churchs-gay-obsession.html?emc=edit_th_20141005&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=40353538&_r=0
ReplyDelete