I saw a first-rate documentary at the San Francisco Jewish
Film Festival yesterday, titled Germans
and Jews. A collaboration by two New
Yorkers, director Janina Quint, who grew up as a non-Jew in Germany, and
producer Tal Recanati, who grew up Jewish in the U.S. and in Israel, it is a
face-on encounter with the effect of the Holocaust on Jewish attitudes toward
Germany and Germans, and a close-up view of Jews living in Germany today. Ken Jaworowsky of The New York Times has called it “part psychology seminar and part
sociology course…a real cause for hope, despite history.”
I worked for the French Railroads years ago, during the 60s,
helping travel agencies and individuals in San Francisco get tickets and
reservations on European trains (i.e., not just in France). I remember a conversation on the phone with a
customer who wanted to get from Paris to Vienna but didn’t want to travel through
Germany. “Why not?” I asked, suspecting
the answer. Sure enough. “Because I’m Jewish,” she answered, without
hesitation.
I’ve known Jews who wouldn’t be caught dead buying a German
car, or even a German washing machine.
The thing is, though, I’m in my 70s and was alive from 1940
to 1945 and remember the end of the war. And that means my Germans vs. Jews notions were formed some time ago. It's hard to keep up with changes, and this film was enlightening indeed. I realized as I watched how much I was in need of the update the film provided.
I remember getting to know concentration camp survivors in the 50s and 60s, and seeing the tattoos on their arms. I remember distinctly how awkward it was getting Germans, even in my own family, to talk of the war. The most common attitude seemed to be, “Some things are best forgotten. I think we should focus on the future, not on the past.” The people I grew up with had direct personal knowledge of the war from a variety of perspectives, German, non-German, Jewish, non-Jewish, including overlapping perspectives, and the burden of memory was simply too much for some of them.
I remember getting to know concentration camp survivors in the 50s and 60s, and seeing the tattoos on their arms. I remember distinctly how awkward it was getting Germans, even in my own family, to talk of the war. The most common attitude seemed to be, “Some things are best forgotten. I think we should focus on the future, not on the past.” The people I grew up with had direct personal knowledge of the war from a variety of perspectives, German, non-German, Jewish, non-Jewish, including overlapping perspectives, and the burden of memory was simply too much for some of them.
I was a student in Munich, in 1960, and I saw an
announcement one time that there would be a showing of concentration camp films in a
large auditorium at the university. I was taking a course
in the history of the Nazi period at the time and was curious about how much
they would actually show. They showed it
all, the kids with the tattooed arms, the “Kauft nicht bei Juden (Don’t buy
from Jews)” signs, right down to the bulldozers pushing corpses into ditches for
burial. Several people got sick and many
went running out of the room. It was an
unforgettable moment, particularly since I had built up the conviction that I
would never get a German to talk about what really happened. It made clear to me that even if the majority
of people were shunning the memory, some were not. Some were facing their country’s immediate
history and trying to figure out what to do with that confrontation.
Over the years I met more people who spoke of asking, “What
did you do during the war, Papa?” and
then as the years went by, “What did you do during the war, Grandpa?” and of
either getting no answer at all, or the protest that their people were never
“Mitmacher” – people who went along.
Other histories of the early post-war period, beyond the
scope of this documentary but relevant to its conclusions, reveal just how
long the de-nazification process took to unfold. One example is the fight by Fritz Bauer to
bring Adolf Eichmann to justice. That story is told in The People vs. Fritz Bauer, also playing at the SF Jewish Film Festival this year. And in Labyrinth of Lies, which I reviewed last October. The
American decision to pursue the Cold War led them to drag their feet on
bringing Nazi crimes into the public view, and that only furthered the “focus
on the future” argument.
But in all this time, I realized that I was getting a look at this question entirely from the non-Jewish German perspective. I didn’t know a single German Jew living in Germany today. And for that reason, the film had an impact on me beyond the obvious.
For one thing, I was working with the assumption that the majority of Germans still remained ignorant of the Holocaust, or perhaps had a superficial understanding, something akin to Americans’ knowledge of their cowboy-and-Indian history.
The American TV mini-series, The Holocaust, was shown on German television in 1978 and was viewed by half the German population. Despite some criticism - Elie Wiesel called it soap opera and a trivialization - it had, from most reports, a profound impact on Germans.
Since then the topic has been opened wide, and one of the people interviewed claimed that Germans are better informed on the topic than other Europeans. Whether that's true doesn't matter much - it's not a competition. What matters is that German history no longer stops with Charlemagne, as another interviewee said of his school experience. There is now extensive coverage in school of the time of the Third Reich, and a large number of documentaries, including
some featuring the children of Nazis, including Nazis who ran the concentration
camps, are now widely available for viewing.
History of the Third Reich is no longer a taboo subject and information
once shunned is now out in the open. Whether and to what degree reconciliation takes place, at least the ground is better prepared for it than in previous decades. A sea change has taken
place from the attitude in the first decade or two after the war, where
anti-Semitism was still in the air as part of the cultural baggage, like smoke
in the floors and walls of a building which had suffered a major fire.
Today, if anything, the pendulum may have swung too far in the other direction. Anti-Semitism has largely been replaced by philo-Semitism, the desire on the part of Germans to bend over backwards to be kind to Jews on the personal level and speak kindly of anything Jewish. As Thorsten Wagner points out, many Germans are only too happy to point out to you how smart the Jews are, how musical, how talented this way and that. He worries that they sometimes spill over – how good at business, for example – into praise that could turn to anti-Semitism in an instant. Wagner is the Danish academic director of a program called Fellowships at Auschwitz, affiliated with the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York, and an example of somebody with a Nazi background who has made a career in Jewish, particularly holocaust, history. German historian, Fritz Stern, who also figures prominently in the documentary, worries that the desire to keep the memory of the Holocaust alive has a downside – he’d like for Jews to be known for something besides their history as victims.
What puts this documentary a cut above most is the brilliant
selection of voices chosen to tell the story. Besides Thorsten Wagner and Fritz Stern, there is a Russian couple, the Gops, two of a great many Russian Jews
who have left the Soviet Union for Germany.
The husband speaks freely and openly.
He’s very happy with his choice.
Not that he has become a patriot, but because, he says, it’s a great place
to live and raise his children. His wife
has many of the same attitudes – used to have, that is – of her parents’
generation – “How could a Jew ever live in
Germany again?” One of the Germans in
the film declares that he doesn’t want to identify as German, but as European,
expressing an attitude that until recently was common among Germans. A German woman wonders if she's mistaken for Jewish because she has a big nose. A jarring note, but one which gives the film a sense of authenticity.
Neue Synagoge, Oranienburgerstrasse, Berlin |
The filmmakers put on a dinner and invited all the
participants to share their thoughts around the table. Their conversation is interspersed with
talking head commentary and scenes of normal life in Berlin today. What comes of this is a remarkably positive
image of life in Berlin today, with the assumption that this applies to rest of
the country, as well. Particularly
striking is the number of Israelis who have emigrated to Berlin. Partly because it’s a thriving in-place to
be, with a lively cultural and night life, partly, as one Israeli confesses,
“because it’s safer than Israel.”
Menorah before the Brandenburg Gate |
The positive image of Germany portrayed in the film is not a
whitewash.
There are still neo-Nazis to contend with. And even more troubling are a number of immigrants from Turkey and other Muslim-culture nations who have brought anti-Semitism with them as part of their cultural inheritance. And then there is the fact that this place called Germany, which once had as many as half a million Jews today has fewer than 120,000, or .2% of the German population, a constant reminder of genocide. The point though, is that that number is rising faster in Germany than anywhere else, and there are some stunning iconic images to represent that change – the rebuilt Oranienburger Strasse New Synagogue, for example and the image of the 30-foot menorah in front of the Brandenburg Gate.
There are still neo-Nazis to contend with. And even more troubling are a number of immigrants from Turkey and other Muslim-culture nations who have brought anti-Semitism with them as part of their cultural inheritance. And then there is the fact that this place called Germany, which once had as many as half a million Jews today has fewer than 120,000, or .2% of the German population, a constant reminder of genocide. The point though, is that that number is rising faster in Germany than anywhere else, and there are some stunning iconic images to represent that change – the rebuilt Oranienburger Strasse New Synagogue, for example and the image of the 30-foot menorah in front of the Brandenburg Gate.
The desire for remembrance is inevitably in conflict with the desire of people to focus on the positive. Elie Wiesel spent his life telling the holocaust story, and was plagued by people complaining of his beating a dead horse. Like Bernie Sanders, who was put down by opponents for his johnny-one-note focus on economic disparity in the U.S., Wiesel’s vow that “they shall not be forgotten” came with a cost. Simon Wiesenthal hunted Nazis all his life and had to contend with charges that he was dredging up bad memories and hounding people who had moved on and built new productive lives, to no good end.
Stolpersteine |
“Stolpern” is “stumble” in German, and in 1992 Cologne artist Gunter Demnig came up with the idea of placing cobblestones with brass plates in the road for people to “stumble across.” They are put there by people who want to remember that "a Jew once lived here" or worked here or was otherwise associated with a particular place nearby. In Germans and Jews a woman, reflecting the guilt many Germans feel toward Jews, spoke of going out and polishing the plaques in front of her building. She then located relatives of the people on the plaque and let them know their loved ones were being remembered. Call it schmalzy, if you will. I call it reconciliation.
Another important issue taken up in the documentary is how
differently anti-semitism and Nazism are remembered by those who grew up in the
Federal Republic (West Germany) and in the German Democratic Republic (East
Germany). The East Germans put all their
emphasis on building socialism and claimed all the
Nazis had left for the West, thus enabling them to claim Nazism was a strictly
West German phenomenon. A remarkable
fiction, one with effects still felt in the difficulty East Germans have coming to terms with the seeds of fascism and anti-semitism still extant in
modern life. It’s hard to root something out you don’t believe was there in the first place.
Time seems to be healing even something as brutal and
inhuman as the Holocaust and the devastation inflicted by the Third Reich. Germans
and Jews speaks not only to those interested in Jewish and
German history. But to all of us who
surrender at times to despair and cynicism.
Of the many dramatic moments in this story of reconciliation in Germans and Jews, the most memorable
one, I think, is the story of the Russian couple, the Gops. The husband represents those who argue for
forgetting history. The wife, those who
for one reason or another cannot forget or who will themselves not to forget. In the end, Mrs. Gop comes around to
embracing this new Germany they have emigrated to. The moment came, she says, when she saw her son playing with the
German team in the international Maccabiah games, which some like to refer to
as the “Jewish Olympics,” in Israel. There they were, Jewish kids
in Israel, rooting for their home team.
“Deutschland! Deutschland! Deutschland!” they were shouting.
I guess I can call Germany home now, said Mrs. Gop.
credits: dinner conversation;
Germans and Jews
Released by First Run Features
Released by First Run Features
English and German with English subtitles
USA. 76 min. Not rated
No comments:
Post a Comment