Thursday, March 25, 2021

Don't need no immaculate conception

Mary, the woman Jesus would have called Mutti, if he had been German-speaking, was born, we are told, without original sin. You have to believe that at pain of excommunication if you’re going to be Roman Catholic, since it’s an actual doctrine, with a name: the Immaculate Conception. Now many people get this wrong. They think “immaculate” (sex being dirty) conception has to do with the fact that Mary gave birth to Jesus without having done the deed first. None of that dirty stuff, semen, which is the mechanism by which original sin is passed from generation to generation, was passed between her and Joe. Not till later on, at a time not revealed in the bible, but by the fact that Jesus had at least one brother and probably other siblings as well.


But Immaculate Conception, a doctrine proclaimed as recently as 1854, has nothing to do with Jesus’ birth. Pope Pius IX came up with the brilliant idea of declaring himself infallible back about then, when it came to laying out doctrines “ex cathedra” (i.e., from his papal chair, i.e., when he was actually at work and not sipping slivovitz whilst reposing at Castel Gondolfo with some of his fellow cardinals, who voted to make him infallible.


My own mother, whose birthday was 106 years ago today, was not born free from original sin, if I am to follow that line of thinking. She was born to a couple of highly fallible youngsters, one of whom was a twenty-year-old country-girl named Bertha, in a small town in Lower Saxony called Celle, about twenty-five miles north of Hannover and 75 miles south of Hamburg. And in an institution we don’t have in this country: a hospital for midwifery. To this day, if I am not mistaken, Germany still holds midwives in higher regard in the medical profession than we do here in the U.S.  


Good thing, too. My mother came out at barely two pounds, I’m told, and the fact that I’m here today typing these lines is no doubt due to the fact that midwives in Germany had the backing of a decent German medical institution, and my mother did not have to be born immaculately in a stable among horses and goats. Or Heidschnucken.

Celle is the gateway to a wonderful area in North Germany known as the Lüneburg Heath (Lüneburger

Heide, in German), home to, among other animals, a short-tailed sheep called the Heidschnucke (see photo of a Heidschnucke ewe, at right), a name that has always tickled my fancy. Sounds like a term of endearment, somehow.


Being born puny, my mother suffered lots of childhood maladies. At one point she was taken to a shepherd on the heath. He pulled out one of her hairs, analyzed it, and apparently cured what ailed her. Everybody with any knowledge of that event is long gone, so the questions that pop into my mind now as an adult with new questions about my origins with every passing day, must remain unanswered. What a pity children are not born with a natural inclination to question their elders while there is still time.


1915 was right plunk in the middle of the First World War. Bertha brought my mother home to live with her parents while Karl, her husband, was off at the front. I never got the whole story, because we didn’t burden children with tales of character weakness of their parents when I was small, but somehow Karl never came home. He was reputed at one point to have run off with a French mistress, but that is of no significance. What is, is the fact that they divorced and Karl went on to marry again and produce two boys, Kurt and Willi.

I met Willi and have discussed the fact elsewhere that he became a fairly illustrious trainer of dressage horses. However bitter the divorce might have been, my grandmother still had contact with Karl, and urged me to meet my Uncle Willi in 1961, while I was studying in Munich. Willi had four children. One of them, Katharina, still runs his stables in Warendorf, and another, Daniela, and I have become fast friends.


One of the advantages of living long is that you can see how very arbitrary your life’s path is. Bertha gave her daughter to her sister to raise. That sister, Johanne, and her husband, Paul, adopted her and brought her to Torrington, Connecticut, apparently with the assistance of a people-mover from Bertha’s mother’s side of the family. Clara married my father, who gave me both a Canadian (Nova Scotian) identity and, by dint of my Connecticut birth, a New England one as well. We were working-class folk, but not of the peasant class who lived their entire lives in one village. I was in Japan when my mother died and stopped off in California to get a suit for the funeral before completing my journey half-way around the world to say good-bye.


I lived many more years apart from my mother, in California, in Japan, and in a Germany which she never got to know. I met a brother she never met, I speak a standard German she never spoke that well (she was raised speaking Low German), and I moved out of the house when I was eighteen, never to return except for very short visits over the years.


For many of those years I felt a great sad distance from my mother. Now that I have outlived her by two decades, my mind wanders often to the science fiction notion of returning across time and getting to know her. I know many sixty-year-olds. They strike me as still young, yet amply old enough to learn from. How much I would enjoy getting to know my mother as an adult, probing her childhood memories for details I failed to collect growing up.


I saw my Grandmother (Großmutter - Bertha) cry only twice. Once was when I was leaving for Europe at the age of twenty. “Don’t cry,” I said to her, “I’ll be back in a year.” “I’m not crying because you’re leaving,” she responded. “I’m crying because of what’s going to happen to you.” She explained to me that she had spent her life in Germany homesick for her family in Connecticut, or in Connecticut homesick for her family in Germany.


The other time I saw her cry she told me she missed her mother. I thought she had a screw loose; her mother had died fifty years before.


But now I understand.





Monday, March 8, 2021

Watching the interview with Meghan and Harry

I remember a conversation with a bunch of friends many years ago in Japan. Princess Michiko was in the news and everyone was talking about her nervous breakdown. She was the first so-called commoner to marry into the Japanese imperial family and did so over the protestations of her mother-in-law, Nagako, the wife of Hirohito. It's a pissing-downriver story. Nagako didn't learn a thing from being dished as not-quite-prime-time material for the Emperor, since she was not of the Fujiwara clan, and made Michiko's life so miserable that Michiko at one point stopped speaking entirely for several months.

I voiced the opinion that Michiko was to be pitied, a view that someone else sitting around the table immediately labeled as ridiculous. Feel sorry for her? She's a child of privilege and part of the whole rotten system. She deserves what she gets for marrying the jerk.

A third person at the table thought it was indelicate to feel sorry for the royals. We should respect them as symbols of the nation and not talk about them as individuals.

The memory of this conversation came rushing back at me when I heard Meghan Markle say last night at the Oprah interview that she felt a strong connection with The Little Mermaid as soon as she learned that the Mermaid had married a prince and promptly lost her voice. The comparison with Michiko was unavoidable.

And the Oprah interview is no doubt going to be another Rashomon experience, one in which there will be a sharp competition among ways to frame the event. Royals - who cares?  Or, royals are people too - show some human compassion!  Or that's what Harry gets for not playing the game and marrying somebody more suitable for the job. Or no, the British Royal Family is a ship covered with barnacles; it's time to scrape them off.

I grew up in New England, where a TV set was placed on the stage of my school auditorium when I was 12 so everybody could watch Princess Elizabeth crowned queen. And in Nova Scotia, I slept in a bedroom with a photo of Queen Victoria hanging on the wall. So forming views on the British royalty was unavoidable, and like many, I went through various stages of not-quite-but-almost adoration to scoffing at the notion of royalty to falling in love with the boys William and Harry to sneering at their incredibly homely doorstop of a father to engaging in serious debate over whether the U.S. had made a terrible error in putting the head of state and the head of government in a single person and might be better off with a figurehead of a king or queen.

Mostly I'm put off by the tabloids and their need to turn the world to shit to make a buck. The British tabloids may actually be worse than the American tabloids, if that's possible, and I watched with great sympathy when Meghan dropped the two bombshells that because she felt so much an outsider in the family that she actually contemplated suicide and when she asked for help she got the response: "We've all been through it, girl, buck up."

Two important details contextualize her agony. One, if she had read what the tabloids were saying about her, Harry suggests, she might have actually gone through with the suicide and wouldn't be alive today. And two, Harry recognized that what had happened to his mother was now happening to his wife. The family was not being family, it was being institution. There was nobody inside to talk to, nobody to turn to. 

Back to framing the story. Do we frame this as evidence that Harry wasn't sufficiently dutiful in not letting somebody higher up choose his wife? They almost certainly would not have chosen Meghan. Or do we frame it as a royal fairy tale love story where the prince adores his beloved so much that he's willing to hold the family up to what is no doubt going to be a huge pile of criticism and derision? And quite possibly a fracture so severe that it can never be mended? And poor Queen Lizzie - talk about annus horribilis'es!

There's more bombshell material: the suggestion - from whom Harry refused to say - that someone in the family worried aloud whether his kids might actually have skin that is unacceptably dark. Meghan gets in a great dig there - mentioning that 60% of the British Commonwealth is made up of dark-skinned people and they are squandering an opportunity to make a connection there. Loved that bit, without bothering to fact-check the claim.

Let's hear it for Oprah. Great interview. Called Harry "Harry," bringing home the consequences of withdrawing from the role of heir to the throne. And making a home in the former colonies, where people don't know the difference between "Your grace," "Your magnificence" and "Your royal dum-de-dum."

I'm not inclined to bash the royals. I've already said I prefer to see them as Harry does, as "des mouches prises dans le miel (flies caught in honey) - my term, not his," people trapped in lives not of their choosing. I doubt I could make much of a personal connection with Charles, much less Philip, or, for that matter, any of the whole lot. But having learned to see my own parents as people who played the game of life much better than I ever gave them credit for when they were alive, with the cards they were dealt, I'm not going to spend any time making moral evaluations of these folks. First of all, I know them only through the very unreliable news media, and second, I want to be remembered less for the condemnations I've made of folk over the years and more for the efforts I've made to find sympathy and compassion.

Watching the Oprah interview was great entertainment. I like beautiful women and Meghan is a beautiful woman. And I love seeing that cute little red-headed child of Charles and Diana now all grown up and acting so forcefully as a husband and father. More power to you both.

Hope you continue to be good to each other.




Saturday, March 6, 2021

Saints come marchin' in...

Shirley, good Mrs. Murphy shall follow me all of the days of my life,

And I shall dwell in the house of the Lord forever…


Parent to child: “You behave, now!”

Child: “I am heyv!”


Ye Highlands and Ye Lowlands,

Oh, where hae ye been?

They hae slain the Earl Amurray

And Lady Mondegreen.


That last line is actually “laid him on the green” but was misheard.


And that’s the origin of the word “mondegreen” - which is a “mondegreen” in its own right.


A mondegreen is a word you hear that doesn’t make sense to you, so you fish around for ways to make it make sense, and come up with an original concoction.


Kids do it all the time:


And lead us not into Penn Station…

Give us this day our jelly bread…


But not just kids.


There’s a town in the Rheinland-Palatinate, in Germany, called Katsenelnbogen, which means “cat’s elbow.” (in modern day German it would be Katzenellbogen).


Once upon a time there was a Germanic tribe living in what is now Hesse, called the Chatti.


And overlooking the Rhein Valley is a mountain known as Melibokus, about 20 km south of Darmstadt. Some historians have speculated that “Katsenelnbogen” was a mondegreen of Chatti-Melibokus, but we’re now, obviously, pretty thick in the weeds.


Origin aside, Katsenelnbogen is the birthplace of a rabbi who took his name from the town, Meir Katsenellenbogen, in 1482. Meir, whose original name was Meir ben Isaac, achieved fame as the Rabbi of Venice, among other things, but is also credited (Wikipedia says this citation needs further accreditation) with being the ancestor of a number of notables, including Karl Marx, Martin Buber, David Halberstam, Felix Mendelssohn, and the British publisher, the Right Honorable George Weidenfeld, who may or may not be related to my neighbors, the Weidenfelds.


Also Eyran Katsenelenbogen, who, along with his friend, Tal Silber, gave a great one-piano-four-hands performance of “When the Saints Come Marchin’ in,” in ten different styles,  in Weifang, China, back in 2014.


And did you know that Mòzhātè, Xiāobāng, Lǐsītè, and Débiāoxī - or 莫扎特, 肖邦,李斯特,德彪西, if you prefer - are how you say Mozart, Chopin, Liszt and Debussy in Chinese?


But I’ll stop here.