Jennifer Teege |
Thanks to the Steven
Spielberg movie, Schindler’s List, most
people know the story of how Oskar Schindler was able to save Jews from
concentration camps by putting them to work in the Plaszow Forced Labor Camp
outside of Krakow making munitions. The
film starred Liam Neeson as Schindler, Ben Kingsley as the Jewish accountant,
and Ralph Fiennes as the psychopathic commandant of the concentration camp
which supplied the workers to Schindler’s factory. Schindler's List made a tremendous impact,
was nominated for twelve Academy Awards and came away with seven, including
Best Picture and Best Director.
Part of the film’s impact
was due to the fact that it was based on a true story. Schindler was a businessman playboy who started
out as a war profiteer who had no compunctions about using slave labor. Over time, though, he developed a conscience and
morphed from war profiteer into a hero by using his own money to pay the
commandant for more and more workers to be transferred to his factory. Because the factory was producing
munitions, the argument could be made it was necessary to keep the workers
alive as long as possible. In the end,
1100 workers’ lives were saved.
We know what happened to
Schindler after the war. His name came
to represent “The Good German” and he was honored by Israel as a “righteous
man.” Anybody who bears the name of
Schindler would be proud of the association with their famous ancestor.
But imagine yourself
wandering through a library one day, just browsing for a book to read. You come across a book related to Schindler and
realize for the first time that the name of the concentration camp commandant
was Amon Goeth. You are adopted, but you
know that your birth mother’s name was also Goeth. It’s an unsettling coincidence. But nothing like the feelings that wash over
you as you read further and come to the awareness that your birth mother was
this very same man’s daughter. And you
are Agon Goeth’s granddaughter, this man you know from the movie, who used to
shoot slackers in the concentration camp from his balcony for sport, and then
send in his dogs to rip their bodies to pieces.
Tomorrow, the 27th
of January, is the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the
concentration camp just outside Krakow.
To mark the occasion, ARD, the German public television consortium, has
published links online to sixteen radio and television programs having to do
with Auschwitz and its aftermath, and on how Germans are processing this event
in their history now in the third generation.
One of these is the story of Jennifer Teege, the
granddaughter of Amon Goeth and her discovery of her origins.*
Adding to the drama of the
discovery is the fact that Jennifer is a beautiful woman with dark skin. Americans and others for whom race is still a
salient category, and who assign children of parents of different races, like their president, to the black
category, would call her black. Jennifer
Teege has been assigned by fate the task of uncovering not only who her
maternal grandfather was, but who this man from Nigeria was her mother had a
fling with, and who added yet more complexity to her biological make-up. Fortunately, after her mother dropped her off at a catholic orphanage
when she was only a few weeks old, she was taken in by a foster family who then
adopted her and raised her to become the intelligent and articulate, obviously
warmly loved, wife and mother she is today.
There’s one more twist to the story, which many will find ironic. At some point in her life, before discovering
her origins, she went to Israel, where she settled for a time, learned Hebrew, and fell in love, before returning to her home in Germany.
The story of Jennifer Teege
is not new. She published her story in
German last year and an English-language version will be published in April
with the title: My Grandfather Would Have
Shot Me: A Black Woman Discovers Her Family's Nazi Past. But I am grateful to ARD for bringing her
story out with all the other reminders of the time into which I was born and a
people with whom I identify.
I grew up with people who spent hours talking about their roots. We were
able, on my father’s side, to trace the
path of ancestors from Scotland and Ireland to Nova Scotia and New England. All the immigrants on my mother’s
side came from Northern Germany. One of the
great delights in recent years was the discovery that, when I went to visit my
mother’s brother-from-a-different-mother in Hamburg in 1961, there was a
little girl in the next room. Her name is Daniela, and she would turn out to be a friend and
cousin I now welcome decades later into my life with open arms, and a fellow sleuth
in revealing to her siblings that their grandmother was not their grandfather’s
first wife, and that he had previously married my grandmother and given birth
to my mother, and that they had a whole line of blood relatives in America.
Ancestry sleuthing has been
a source of curiosity and delight, in other words, for me and for most of the people I know
caught up in the search for roots. We
may joke about uncovering a horse thief or a pirate somewhere in the blood
line, but when an ancestor turns out to be on the shady side, we feel sufficiently far
removed to feel no shame of connection.
And when they turn out to be heroic figures, we beat the drums of
association.
This game takes on an added dimension for adopted children who struggle with nagging questions like why their mothers gave them up and whether there are things in their background about which they would feel shame if they uncovered them. The endless academic debate over the relative
importance of nature and nurture is one thing in the ivory tower. It takes on a different cast when it settles
into your own flesh and blood. One has
only to think of all the children born of rape, including the thousands of
children born following an invasion by a foreign army. Some of them have to live with the knowledge not only that their fathers were rapists, but that they were thrown away by their
mothers, who could not bear to see in their eyes the man who assaulted them.
Only in
modern times have we begun to think in terms of people as individuals, with separate and
distinct entities, and with human rights quite apart from those claimed by tribes
and nation and family. Today, as the struggle of Jennifer Teege to come to terms with her personal history illustrates, we can get past impulses to feel shame and fear. I don't know about you, but the emotion I associate with her is admiration, as I imagine her sharing her history with others like her Israeli friends. And explaining to her children who their great-grandfather was.
All the same, it is easier
for most of us to deny the ugly reality of blood lines. Even Jennifer Teege herself says at one point
that while it was difficult growing up with dark skin in a race-conscious
Germany, that racial difference would turn out to be a major aid in getting her
out of the months-long depression that followed her discovery of her connection
with Amon Goeth. One book reviewer takes
issue with the claim that Goeth would have shot her for being black, but for
her it has turned out to be a comfort.
As, no doubt, was the fact that her grandmother was Goeth’s mistress and
not his wife, even though she did take his name. The struggle illustrates the importance we
still place on blood and on tribal connections.
We may be living in an
enlightened age of humanist values where we are to be judged not by the color
of our skin or other accidents of birth but by the content of our
character. But this means engaging the
head and living up to the principle of judging each other as self-standing
individuals with our own moral choices, and not surrendering to sentimental
notions of racial and national identity.
We are all descended from monsters and rapists. Some of us just happen to have more distance from them than
others, but that distance, too, is merely an accident of birth, and nothing to
take credit for. Overcoming history, as
the South African policy of peace and reconciliation shows us, is not just a theoretical
possibility. We can make it happen. Not by forgetting it, but by telling
stories. About the victims, most of all,
of course. But also about Oskar
Schindler. And learning from Teege that
sometimes you don’t have a choice to forget, but must find a place to put the
facts of history in your head without letting them drive you insane.
In Alan Bennett’s The History Boys, one of the boys
defines history as, “just one bloody thing after another.” It’s a great line. And it is
all that history is if we choose not to engage with it. The anniversary of the liberation of
Auschwitz tomorrow is a chance to do more than that. Most people I know will not know another year
has rolled around. And if they do hear
of it, they will prefer to just move on.
My father had a number of pithy sayings he would drop into conversation and drive me up a wall with – like "even a
clock that is stopped is right twice a day.”
Another was the line from the Gospel of Matthew, “Sufficient unto the
day is the evil thereof.” Let bygones be
bygones.
It was by chance, not by
design, that I happened to come across the ARD focus on Auschwitz on this
anniversary occasion. I’m glad I
did. I’m glad somebody’s still paying
attention.
I should point out that Jennifer Teege is not the only grandchild of a concentration camp commandant to open her life to public scrutiny. Rainer Höss, the grandson of Rudolf Höss, the commandant of Auschwitz, has also gone public, written a book, and done a number of interviews on television, including this one on Südwest Rundfunk Channel 1. And there are others. The damage done to individual psyches is still being worked out in the third and fourth generation.
Also, worth adding here, I think, is the fact that the film Night Will Fall will be shown around the world tomorrow (in the U.S., unfortunately, only on HBO cable television) to mark the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz.
No comments:
Post a Comment